Refine your search
Collections
Journals
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z All
Chaudhary, Desh Deepak
- Food Resource Exploitation in Ladybirds:Consequences of Prey Species and Size
Abstract Views :220 |
PDF Views:85
Authors
Affiliations
1 Ladybird Research Laboratory, Department of Zoology, University of Lucknow, Lucknow 226 007, IN
1 Ladybird Research Laboratory, Department of Zoology, University of Lucknow, Lucknow 226 007, IN
Source
Current Science, Vol 110, No 7 (2016), Pagination: 1343-1349Abstract
In the present study, preference between larger and smaller instars of Acyrthosiphon pisum and Aphis craccivora by small and large female variants of ladybirds Menochilus sexmaculatus and Propylea dissecta has been investigated. Results reveal that both ladybird species consumed smaller prey, A. craccivora over larger prey, A. pisum when kept individually and/or in combination. Although small and large female variants of both ladybird species consumed smaller and larger instars of A. craccivora respectively, they preferred smaller instars of A. pisum. Similar results were also recorded within combinations. Thus, food resource exploitation in both ladybirds is due to both prey species and size.Keywords
Aphids, Food Resource Exploitation, Ladybirds, Prey Species and Size Resource Polymorphism.- Seven spots fusion patterns of elytra as a marker of melanization in ladybird, Coccinella septempunctata Linnaeus (Coleoptera: Coccinellidae)
Abstract Views :170 |
PDF Views:76
Authors
Affiliations
1 Department of Zoology, Indira Gandhi National Tribal University, Amarkantak 484 887, India, IN
1 Department of Zoology, Indira Gandhi National Tribal University, Amarkantak 484 887, India, IN
Source
Current Science, Vol 123, No 12 (2022), Pagination: 1421-1421Abstract
No Abstract.References
- Majerus, M. E. N., Melanism: Evolution in Action, Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK, 1998.
- True, J. R., Trends. Ecol. Evol., 2003, 18, 640–647.
- Stewart, L. A. and Dixon, A. F. G., Funct. Ecol., 1989, 3, 165–177.
- Rhamhalinghan, M., Ind. Zool., 1985, 9, 91–97.
- Rhamhalinghan, M., In Proceedings of the Fifth Indian Symposium on Invertebrate Reproduction Department of Zoology (ed.Palanicchami, S.), Arulmigu Palani Anda-var College of Arts and Culture, Palani, 1987, pp. 149–157.
- Srivastava, S. and Omkar, Eur. J. Ento-mol., 2005, 102, 189–194.
- de Jong, P. W. and Brakefield, P. M., Proc. R. Soc. London, Ser. B, 1998, 265, 39–43.
- Clusella-Trullas, S., van Wyk, J. H. and Spotila, J. R., J. Therm. Biol., 2007, 32, 235–245.
- Osawa, N. and Nishida, T., Heredity, 1992,69, 297–307.
- O’Donald, P. and Majerus, M. E. N., Here-dity, 1992, 61, 521–526.
- Forsman, A., Evol. Ecol., 2011, 25, 1247–1257.
- Watt, W. B., Evolution, 1968, 22, 437–458.